Hackelman on Machida: "He's one of the least guys I want Chuck to fight"

by LR 1/9/2008 5:26:00 PM
Review Journal

An interesting tidbit from an interview with John Hackelman over at FightHype.com. When asked about Machida calling out Liddell, he had this to say:

"He's one of the least guys I want Chuck to fight. Not for his toughness or anything, its that his style is hardest to prepare for. I knew he would beat Sokoudjou. He was 2-1 underdog and so was chuck. Glover beat Soko before and I knew he was hype. He's #4 in the world, they had him 4 places before Chuck. My guy that KO'd him is not even in the top20. You know what Machida is like? he is so boring, like the Larry Holmes of MMA. He'll fucking beat everyone. Jimmy Young was like that too, Jimmy is the reason that Foreman retired and went to Jesus. (...) Machida is like Jimmy Young, he's a scary guy. Going to be a hard guy to beat"

This is a very interesting quote for a few reasons. First and foremost, it definitely hints at what many fans expected from a matchup between Liddell and Machida matchup... a nightmare for Liddell. Hackelman knows it, and most of the MMA community knows it. It's hard to prepare for Machida for the simple fact that he sits back and waits for the aggression from his opponent. He's elusive, and his main attack relies on straight counterattacks and range attacks. It may be a boring style for many fans of the sport, but it usually pays off later in the fight when his opponent becomes frustrated. It's interesting how his style and recent fights have begun to discourage even the men who train these fighters.

Another comment regarding Soukoudjou that I don't understand entirely. Glover isn't top 20, but Soukoudjou was fighting in only his 3rd MMA fight. The Glover fight really wasn't a tactical fight at all either. It was mostly Glover throwing huge bombs at will and hoping he'd land one, which he did. To be perfectly fair to Soukoudjou's ranking, that was a fight that could be chalked up to "anything can happen in MMA". Glover threw huge shots and caught Soukoudjou. Glover went nowhere, Soukoudjou went on to beat Arona and "Little Nog".

Lastly, and on a personal note, the "Machida is boring" routine is rather old. Not only did he defeat a heavy striking and very strong Soukoudjou, but he did so in impressive fashion. His counter punching has the precision of a cruise missile. If you actually watch the fight and watch Machida's brilliant countering, it's really a work of art. He throws with full force so quickly to counter a rush that his opponents are devastated by the incoming blows. Easily, Machida has become one of my favorite fighters, and I encourage other fans to check him out.

As for Hackelman, he's right. It is a bad matchup for Chuck. But guess what? He's on the way back to the top, so either way, Chuck should be weary that the fight is a possibility.

Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people

  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags:

Chuck Liddell | Lyoto Machida



Related posts

Comments

January 10. 2008 06:23

Machida should fight Wandi, it would be a great mix of styles.

Amir us

January 10. 2008 10:30

I'm with you, LR. Machida is one of my favorite fighters because he's smart and effective. People complain that MMA is more about entertainment and that Machida is boring, but at the end of the day, the man is undefeated and fighting in the biggest organization in the world. He must be doing something right, and sooner or later, he'll have to get a title shot.

Dedwyre us

January 11. 2008 06:50

Dude, can you explain what this means: "Not only did he impressively defeat a heavy striking and very strong Soukoudjou, but he did so in impressive fashion." Isn't that like saying, "Not only did he quickly defeat Soukoudjou, but he did so quickly"? Your site is informative, but the writing is horrible. Maybe you could hire a copyeditor?

Sorry to be critical, but on a site whose purpose it to *be* critical, it'd be nice to see that criticism written to a higher, more professional, standard. That would give your interesting thoughts a lot more credibility and would make a good site even better.

Kevin Foster ca

January 11. 2008 07:14

Kevin,

I'm sorry if you feel the writing is horrible. I'm growing as a writer through this site, and the fact is that I have other things on my plate at times that cause my writing to suffer.

It's a good catch by you on your part, and I will work to edit my own articles more closely.

LR us

January 11. 2008 08:54

Hey LR.

I should have edited myself--the writing isn't horrible across the board, just at certain cringe-inducing moments. Thanks for your gracious reply, and keep working at it.

Kevin Foster ca

Add comment


 

  Country flag

[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]



Live preview

May 16. 2008 09:51



Our Writers

  • Leland Roling - Editor
  • Joe Schmitt - Staff Writer
  • John McKiernan - Staff Writer
  • Matthew Watt - Staff Writer